|
|
F Units
Jun 5, 2015 20:14:30 GMT -5
Post by tommann on Jun 5, 2015 20:14:30 GMT -5
The large photos of this model look absolutely fabulous. I'm looking forward to a Milwaukee Road model.
|
|
|
|
F Units
Jun 6, 2015 13:58:44 GMT -5
Post by pray59 on Jun 6, 2015 13:58:44 GMT -5
Which Northern Pacific release is planned, Passenger or Freight? Also, NP ran ABA, are you planning on releasing ABA sets?
I have to plan ahead so I can end up with several ABA sets in both passenger and freight, so I need to choose which go to the stripper.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hans Riddervold (AZL) on Jun 7, 2015 8:20:40 GMT -5
Looks like the first NP run will be passenger. I cannot give a release time at this date, since production is not yet completed. Sincerely, Hans (AZL)
|
|
|
|
Post by smr on Jun 9, 2015 5:46:11 GMT -5
Before I buy a set do you guys have any plans on A D&RGW heavyweight set to go with the Baggage car you already released? We do have plans for D&RGW heavyweights - they are scheduled for the next production run. Best, -Rob(A) AZL Very good news, Robert, count me in for the full D&RGW set ! Best, Sven |
|
|
|
F Units
Jun 15, 2015 13:15:30 GMT -5
Post by davestubbs on Jun 15, 2015 13:15:30 GMT -5
Hi Everyone, just wondering if anyone has tried the drawbar connector. just wondering if it is more trouble than its worth. Does it fit in the stock case? looks like it might snap on and off but not sure. I've already dropped in 2 TCS decoders and man these little engines run great speed is just right and very quite. still can't get over how small they are compared to the E8/9.
|
|
|
|
F Units
Jun 17, 2015 12:19:56 GMT -5
Post by zscalehobo on Jun 17, 2015 12:19:56 GMT -5
still can't get over how small they are compared to the E8/9. According to Wikipedia articles ... E8 is 70ft 3in (21.31m) while an F3 is 51ft 2in (15.6m). An F3 is 71% of the length of an E8. |
|
|
|
F Units
Jun 17, 2015 22:12:44 GMT -5
Post by davestubbs on Jun 17, 2015 22:12:44 GMT -5
Don't get me wrong Frank, they look right. Makes a Marklin look silly. Believe the extra 29% houses a second motor
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
F Units
Jun 18, 2015 14:47:30 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2015 14:47:30 GMT -5
What will be the B&O paint scheme?
|
|
|
|
F Units
Jun 25, 2015 15:53:51 GMT -5
Post by charlie on Jun 25, 2015 15:53:51 GMT -5
Just received my F3 D&RGW!!  Woow woow wooow, what a good job again! Thank you AZL! |
|
|
|
F Units
Jun 25, 2015 16:39:06 GMT -5
Post by smr on Jun 25, 2015 16:39:06 GMT -5
Just received my F3 D&RGW!! Woow woow wooow, what a good job again! Thank you AZL! I like to join in on this thank you - got my F3s today. Can`t wait to get the corresponding D&RGW heavyweights as well !! Remind me, when is the next run of heavyweights? Best, Sven |
|
|
|
F Units
Jun 26, 2015 1:36:20 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by steveeusd on Jun 26, 2015 1:36:20 GMT -5
I'm curious about the size difference between MTL and AZL F7s. It seems to me AZL's new F3 looks undersized. Perhaps, some one out there can provide me some insight.
Thanks,
Steve
|
|
|
|
F Units
Jun 26, 2015 2:41:01 GMT -5
Post by domi on Jun 26, 2015 2:41:01 GMT -5
Did you come to that statement holding one of each side to side in your hand? Or just watching pictures? Because these can be deceiving..
Dom
|
|
|
|
F Units
Jun 26, 2015 8:22:58 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by steveeusd on Jun 26, 2015 8:22:58 GMT -5
Sitting an AZL F3 next to a MTL F7... I think F7 are slightly larger than F3s.... But I've been wrong before... Most F3s have longer smoke stacks than that of F7s. That may be the most distinguishing characteristic though.
Steve
|
|
|
|
F Units
Jun 26, 2015 9:57:35 GMT -5
Post by ztrack on Jun 26, 2015 9:57:35 GMT -5
 Here are two quick iPhone photos show the AZL F3 and a MTL F7. Note the one looking down at the bottom of the locos. The AZL may be a hair smaller, but just barely. What stands out to me is that the MTL trucks are longer, and AZL's are shorter (and more prototypical based on prototype photos). I think what may be the real issue here is that AZL's F3s have a greater level of fidelity. Due to this, they almost appear smaller as they have more intricate detailing. I also think what we may have here is a classic example of all of us getting set in our mindsets. We all have known the F7s for 30 years and just assume all F units should look and feel the same. The new kids are on block are definitely not business at usual and it may take a little time to get use to them. I can personally vouch I had to look twice at the F3s, and appreciate them even more now that I have compared the models to prototype photos.  We all should tip our hat to Nelson Grey, the original designer of the MTL F7s. These little beasts have been the back bone of US Z scale for decades. AZL's models are good representations of new technologies and advances in the hobby. No knocks against MTL's F7s here, just times are a changing... Rob |
|
|
|
F Units
Jun 26, 2015 17:33:11 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by steveeusd on Jun 26, 2015 17:33:11 GMT -5
Thanks Rob for your analysis. From most vantage points, it appears to me that the overall size difference is negligible, which I find a pleasant surprise. Obviously, the AZL F units, due to technological advances in the hobby, have more detail and upgraded mechanical and electronic characteristics. What I like is that those who have collected copious MTL F units don't have to retire them. MTL's units will look acceptable lashed up with AZL's counterparts. Unfortunately, operating both under DCC is another matter.
Steve
|
|
