|
Post by smr on Apr 11, 2018 15:09:51 GMT -5
or this? and then this?
|
|
|
Post by smr on Apr 11, 2018 15:15:11 GMT -5
or a more intensive mix of types? Then followed by Sleepers, correct? (please note the perfect color match of the MTL daylight painting (left) and AZL (right)
|
|
|
Post by smr on Apr 11, 2018 15:22:20 GMT -5
Or with UP diner ?
|
|
|
Post by smr on Apr 11, 2018 15:29:26 GMT -5
And all coach was UP ? Completely lost I am with the tail end......... Something like this? (Doesn't look good, or ?) - to be continued after Mark's input -
|
|
|
Post by markm on Apr 11, 2018 23:17:28 GMT -5
Sven, I'm afraid I don't have access to my printed information until the weekend and there really isn't much on the internet for the San Francisco Overland. Here's a few ideas. This video would be early 1950s and looks about right for the era. This photostream has two images of the SF Overland. There is also an image of the San Joaquin Daylight in a place you might be familiar with: Caliente, CA www.flickr.com/photos/hunter1828/7098235637/in/photostream/To answer your specific question about head end, definitely an SP baggage and two UP baggage. Maybe a fast freight boxcar. I don't believe they ran an RPO, at least on the SP route, but I could see a mail storage car. Hope this is enough to keep you going. Mark
|
|
|
Post by smr on Apr 14, 2018 18:52:00 GMT -5
Thank you, Mark, When I read the story "The slow death of the Overland Limited" streamlinermemories.info/?p=3926 , I stumbled over this picture.... streamlinermemories.info/SP/SFOL1955.jpg....and this train appears quite doable, Gerd once did a A-B-A set of Daylight ALCO PA1s........ May be one could use AZLs E7 A-B-B set instead of the ALCO PA's on the picture? What do you think? Best, Sven PS: They are also great looking engines !!!
|
|
|
Post by markm on Apr 16, 2018 20:58:16 GMT -5
Sven,
Sorry it's taken so long. The reference I really wanted to reference the Trainline story, but I set it aside in a safe place, only to realize now that I don't remember where that is! I'm still looking and when I find it, I'll upgrade this thread.
For power, PA A-B-A set were generally used, however the Shasta Daylight ran E7 A-B-B sets out of Oakland also, so they are a reasonable possibility. The important thing is the Daylight colors.
For the train end, they generally didn't use an observation car, rather a blunt end sleeper car or just hang a tail light in the vestibule of the last car.
A couple of consists I have in my notes:
West bound 1953 on the UP: Baggage - UP #3000, UP #3002, SP #3403 Coach - SP #3403, UP #5318, #5304, #529, #5209 Diner - SP #10204 Lounge - #2981 Sleepers - UP 4-4-2, 6-6-4, 10-6, PRR 10-6 or NYC 10-6 Eastern road sleepers in their respective road paint. SP sleepers in Daylight or UP yellow.
East bound on the SP Baggage - UP HW, SP LW Coach - UP HW, UP LW, SP LW Daylight *2 Lounge - SP HW diner (converted) SP green Diner - C&NW HW Diner Sleepers - as about, plus possible HW 8-1-2
Mark
|
|
|
Post by smr on Apr 25, 2018 4:41:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by markm on Jul 18, 2018 20:37:57 GMT -5
A while back I was writing about the Overland Limited and promised more modeling details. I finally found my notes and here's an update.
I'm picking the 1955 era. The C&NW dropped the Overland in 1953 but still handled through cars. UP dropped the Overland in July 1955, with through cars going on their City of St. Louis. Thus the Overland became an SP Oakland-Ogden train. While UP wanted all the Overland cars repainted to Armour Yellow in 1952, SP was slow to comply and interestingly the SP Overland wasn't repainted to all yellow until the late 1950s. Finally, the winter of 1955 was a wet year with flooding, making it probable that SP re-routed trains through Niles.
Power: steam would be GS-3, 4-8-2 steam, or PAs. F7s and cab-forwards were used in a pinch and as helpers in the Sierra. A train rerouted through Niles (and the Altamont Pass) would be a cab forward or PAs. There are even images of a PA/cab forward mix.
Head end: Westbound trains frequently pulled up to 5 express freight cars - SP, UP, C&NW, CB&Q, NYC, PRR and Wabash. Baggage cars were mostly SP LW & HW in Daylight, TTG and occasionally a UP yellow. SP never painted any baggage yellow, although they used a yellow baggage/dormitory. Despite my earlier post, the Overland would occasionally host east bound mail storage cars and RPOs as overflow from the Overland mail train.
Coaches, sleepers, diners and lounges were much as I described above. By 1955 the dining cars had been downgraded to café cars and lounges and limited to SP rolling stock. 10-6 sleepers ran until 1957 and were mostly UP. Paint schemes could be UP yellow, Daylight, SP green, TTG and Golden State aluminum plus the less frequent C&NW, Walbash, PRR & NYC cars in their colors..
The SP also ran weekend "Gambler Special" coaches on the end of the train for the Oakland-Reno leg. An interesting modeling note is that due to complaints from sleeper passengers, when these cars were added, the consist was run backwards with the sleeper in front and coaches in back. The Gambler's Special eventually became a train in it's own right and lasted well into the Amtrak era.
In the early 50s, the observation car was replaced by a full length dome lounge car (ex: #3601) to compete with the Zephyr Vista Dome. By 1955 this dome was frequently replaced by a HW diner converted to lounge when the passenger load was light.
I hope this generates a few ideas. As for my self, until AZL brings out their LW cars, I'd model this trains with HW baggage and diners from AZLs Daylight and Sunset sets, UP and SP coaches and sleepers from MTL, all paint scheme offerings and a couple for their fast freight boxcars. I'd love to see AZL produce the TTG and Daylight LWs as well as the many road/train name combinations in Armour yellow, although I'd be very happy to be able to get unlettered Armour yellow.
BTW: My interest in the Overland? My first long distance train ride was on the Overland in it's last Christmas season of operation.
Mark
|
|
|
Post by Rob Albritton on Jul 20, 2018 8:51:22 GMT -5
A while back I was writing about the Overland Limited and promised more modeling details. Im one step ahead of you!
|
|
|
Post by markm on Jul 20, 2018 11:00:22 GMT -5
A while back I was writing about the Overland Limited and promised more modeling details. Im one step ahead of you! Well! While I've always been impressed with your railroad research abilities, in this case, with my access to the archives in Sacramento, personal discussions with SP employees of the era, and personal experience on the train, I might have the edge. So wow me. I'll let you take until the end of NTS 2018. Mark
|
|
|
Post by smr on Jul 27, 2018 11:47:49 GMT -5
Hi Mark, While you were looking for details about the Overland Limited, I stumbled over UP's PORTLAND ROSE; Mainly because of this! "Union Pacific had 10 two-tone gray 4-6-6-4 Challengers. These 10 locomotives were part of a group of 13 oil-burning 4-6-6-4 Challengers that UP re-assigned beginning in December 1946 from Southern California on UP's South-Central District, to the Northwestern District. The new service was between Seattle and Portland, and along the Columbia River to Huntington. This group of passenger Challengers included UP 3940, 3944, and 3968, along with the 10 locomotives in the 3975-3984 group. For the two-tone gray locomotives, UP 3976 was the first to receive two-tone gray paint. It was completed in mid December 1946, and used for the first time to pull The Portland Rose eastbound from Portland on December 13, 1946. The story goes that Omaha directed Albina Shop in Portland to repaint the 3976 in gray, photograph it, and send the photo to Omaha for approval. Headquarters liked the new paint job and promptly wired the shop to repaint the rest of the series assigned to the pool. However, the three lower-numbered Challengers, UP 3940, 3944, and 3968, did not receive two-tone gray. Along with two-tone gray paint, all ten locomotives also received smoke lifters, known to UP as "wind wings", a new feature added after October 1945 and intended to keep smoke out of the cabs and away from the operating crews." Source: utahrails.net/up/ttg.php
|
|
|
Post by smr on Jul 27, 2018 11:58:15 GMT -5
And the full train would look like this: 1) 2a)
|
|
|
Post by smr on Jul 27, 2018 12:30:14 GMT -5
2b) 3)
|
|
|
Post by smr on Jul 27, 2018 12:38:45 GMT -5
4) 5)
|
|