Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2017 14:51:06 GMT -5
Hello ...
Before I buy any rolling stock, I want to finalize the design of my layout and I must know the clearance necessary for the cars and locomotives. So, can anybody say : 1) In case of a single track, the width I should leave on each side of that track, measured from the middle. In other words, the halfth of the width necessary for a curved or straight piece of track . In case of double track, I know that the normalized width between the respective middle lines of both tracks is 19mm (MRA norm). So I think that I must leave about 14 to 16mm on each side (measured from the middle). Is this correct ? 2) The height of Superliners, from the top of the rails to the top of the cars. I think they could be the biggest cars I could use (if I run Heavyweights, I believe they are less high). Double stacking does not interest me, and I don't want to fit a catenary. 3) The length of a P42 with 4 Superliners, for the length of the platform ...
Thanks for every answer.
|
|
|
Post by markm on Jan 16, 2017 15:55:38 GMT -5
Alberich, Funny you should ask. I spent yesterday playing with the P42 and the superliners and they are still on my workbench. 1) Generally speaking 12.5mm from center is safe. But really you should get a copy of the standards from a European organization called MOROP. They have produced a set of standards, NEM, in French and German that cover what you're asking. I think the standards you want will be NEM102 & NEM103. The U.S. clearance values can be found at: nmra.org/sites/default/files/standards/sandrp/pdf/s-7_2012.02.pdf2) Knuckle to knuckle, the P42 is 100mm long, the superliner cars 120mm long. The bolster-to-bolster distance (used in some of the calculation you ask about in #1) is 83mm. The height to top of rail 22mm. 3) If you do the math from #2 the total length is just under 600mm. I would suggest planning for a 5 car train. Amtrak typically runs a minimum train of a sleeper, lounge, diner, and two coaches. The only exception I'm aware of is the Spokane/Portland leg of the Empire Builders which runs without a diner. Who knows, maybe you'll want to run a privately owned Tuscan red car on the end of this train as well. Mark 2)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2017 16:11:20 GMT -5
Thank You Mark, I needed exactly those informations ; now I can begin with drawing ...
|
|
|
Post by shamoo737 on Jan 16, 2017 16:20:25 GMT -5
Mark, I would add a baggage car for a little extra lengh, but I am fan of long trains.
|
|
|
Post by shamoo737 on Jan 16, 2017 16:57:17 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by markm on Jan 17, 2017 19:02:29 GMT -5
Mark, I would add a baggage car for a little extra lengh, but I am fan of long trains. True, but then I'd want a transition car and then I'd want .... I was doing some research today and ran across a few images of the potential extremes or modeling of Amtrak Service:
|
|
|
Post by shamoo737 on Jan 18, 2017 0:22:48 GMT -5
Mark, I been looking at the transition car. It doesn't look too hard to make. Even on the prototype, it cover with sheet metal. Its just a matter of moving the door to a lower level. The hard part is coming up with the proper decals. Maybe we can draft Aaron for the job.
|
|
|
Post by Rob Albritton on Jan 18, 2017 7:44:29 GMT -5
Mark, I been looking at the transition car. It doesn't look too hard to make. Even on the prototype, it cover with sheet metal. Its just a matter of moving the door to a lower level. The hard part is coming up with the proper decals. Maybe we can draft Aaron for the job. Moo: SO glad you said that. We thought long and hard about the transition car and finally came to the conclusion that it simply did not justify the tooling cost to create it because it is a fairly easy modification for some of our more advanced clients to do themselves. We also like to leave a few things undone on all of our projects as incentive for folks to stretch their modeling muscles and create unique pieces. This is one of them. Whoever gets it done, please post pictures! Best -Rob(A) AZL PS: some of those decals are going to be VERY difficult as the small text on the superliners pushes the boundaries of what we can do in the factory with laser etched plates and pad printing. It just might be better to leave the printing as-is, or simply delete the "wrong" stuff. But I don't mean to discourage trying - the main thing is to put the plate at the top of the end car so you don't see the door. PSS: Next folks will ask about heritage baggage cars: They are on our "to-do" list, but I doubt they will be delivered this year. Your budget might be better spent on something else this year because we will build the "right" baggage cars for the superliners without compromise.
|
|
|
Post by markm on Jan 18, 2017 9:53:23 GMT -5
Actually, I wouldn't have mentioned the transition car at all, except I had the opportunity to be the only paying passenger in the one returning from Portland in 2015.
Modeling the car is a bit more than move a door. If you check out the images I posted above, you'll notice that while it looks like a coach car there are window differences at the head end. The upstairs interior appeared to be all roomettes.
Rob:
I'm glad you thought about the transition car but really, how many actually exist in prototype? I've seen Amtrak trains here without them, so they aren't critical to Amtrak's operation.
I am very impressed with the pad printing. Considering the detail on the hatches I'm a bit surprised that you didn't need to do direct write.
If the baggage cars won't be out until next year, anyone want to bet that an Oregon company will have a far approximation out by year end? B&O, C&O, Daylight they have seemed to followed up your releases with new paint on their cars.
Mark
|
|
|
Post by billmock on Jan 18, 2017 19:52:14 GMT -5
Hi Mark, I found this about the transition sleeper cars on Railroad.net. They are also known as passenger-dorm cars and are numbered as the AMTK 39000 series. Bill Mock
Postby CHI_Amtrak_Fan ยป Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:16 pm
The 620 sleeper is the transition sleeper that transitions the high level doors of most superliner equipment to the lower level doors of the baggage car ahead. Many will refer to this car as the Trans-Dorm because it serves this transition purpose and holds the crew roomettes.
Picture of Transition Sleeper
The rough layout of the transition sleeper is:
**forward direction of travel** Crew roomettes Center of car with stairs to lower level 23--24 21--22 19--20 17--18 C---T/S **backwards direction of travel** Where C=Coffee station (seldom used) T/S= Toilet/Shower
All of the roomettes sold in the Transition Sleeper are on the upper level. Since all transition sleepers are Superliner II equipment, and Amtrak began selling rooms to the public only in the last couple of years, I found that the roomettes were in excellent shape.
So, Looks like you're going to need to change your other reservation too!
David Z Last edited by CHI_Amtrak_Fan on Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:25 pm, edited 1 time in total. CHI_Amtrak_Fan Posts: 19 Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 6:08 pm Location: Chicago, IL
|
|
|
Post by Commodore on Apr 14, 2024 10:42:36 GMT -5
Mark, I been looking at the transition car. It doesn't look too hard to make. Even on the prototype, it cover with sheet metal. Its just a matter of moving the door to a lower level. The hard part is coming up with the proper decals. Maybe we can draft Aaron for the job. Moo: SO glad you said that. We thought long and hard about the transition car and finally came to the conclusion that it simply did not justify the tooling cost to create it because it is a fairly easy modification for some of our more advanced clients to do themselves. We also like to leave a few things undone on all of our projects as incentive for folks to stretch their modeling muscles and create unique pieces. This is one of them. Whoever gets it done, please post pictures! Best -Rob(A) AZL PS: some of those decals are going to be VERY difficult as the small text on the superliners pushes the boundaries of what we can do in the factory with laser etched plates and pad printing. It just might be better to leave the printing as-is, or simply delete the "wrong" stuff. But I don't mean to discourage trying - the main thing is to put the plate at the top of the end car so you don't see the door. PSS: Next folks will ask about heritage baggage cars: They are on our "to-do" list, but I doubt they will be delivered this year. Your budget might be better spent on something else this year because we will build the "right" baggage cars for the superliners without compromise. Re: PSS!
I started the process of having Viewliner baggage cars produced.
Caution warned me to check with you before spending the big bucks...
|
|
|
Post by Edward on Apr 14, 2024 15:56:39 GMT -5
I am curious as well to which baggage car was going to be made?
|
|